A SOCIOLINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF GENDER ON ENGLISH USE AT THE THIRD GRADE OF MTSN 2 PALU

  • Sri Deva English Tadris Department, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, State Islamic University Datokarama Palu
  • Nurdin English Tadris Department, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, State Islamic University Datokarama Palu
  • Khaerudin Yusuf English Tadris Department, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, State Islamic University Datokarama Palu
Keywords: Gender; Sociolinguistic Analysis.

Abstract

The students at the third grade of MTs N 2 Palu have different social context in their life. Since different students in different societies have distinct ways of life, and language to a considerable degree is influenced by culture. The factors above against this background that this study is carried out to examine how the differences in English use of men and women and at the third grade of MTs N 2 Palu. This research discusses about the differences between men and women in using English. Considering the purpose of the research and the nature of the problem, this research was a qualitative-research. To collect the data the researcher used observation, interview, and video recording. The result of this study shows that the difference between the students in using English is influenced by the social context especially in cultural aspect. When the students use English, the accent of each culture follows into their English. It also affects the intonations and accent when they use English. While, the differences between men and women. Women found it easier to adjust their accents and distinguish accents from the culture and accents of the English. While, man found it difficult. So, when using English men are often carried away with accents from their own culture.

References

Collins Paperback, Dictionary and thesaura, 2006
Dong, J.Y, “study on gender differences in language under the sociolinguistic”, Daqing, China: school of foreign languages, northeast petroleum university, 2014
Edwar Sapir, “Language: An introduction to the study of speech”, texas: rice university, 1921
Food and drugs administration, “Evaluation of sex-specific data in medical device clinical studies”, US, 2014
Gault, RH., “A History of The Questionnaire Methode of Research In Phsychology” Phsychology. 1907, p.366-38
Graham Hitchcock and David Hughes,” Research and the Teacher, a Qualitative Introduction to school-Based Research”, Routledge: New York. 1995, p. 26 – 27
G. Ramesh Babu, “Research Methodology in Social Sciences”, Concept Publishing Company: India, 2008, p.11
Guideline for the study and evaluation of drugs. 2014.
Gumperz and John j, “Studying language, culture, and society: Sociolinguistic or linguistic anthropology”. Journal of linguistics, 2008
Haig, David, The inexorable rise of gender and the decline of sex: social change in Academic titles, 2004
Hernandez-Campoy, J.M, “sociolinguistica britanica: introduccion a la obra de peter trudgirl”, Barcelona: ediciones octaedro,1993
Holmes Jannet, “Introduction to sociolinguistics”, New York: Addison Wesley Longman Publish, 1996
Kevin L. Nadal, “The SAGE Encyclopedia of psychology and gender” 401, 2017
Labov, “sociolinguistic patterns” USA:University of pennsylvania press, 1981
Lakoff,R, Language and women’s place, New York, 1975
Collins,language definition and meaning,collins English dictionary, 2019
Lindsey, Linda L. Gender Role: a Sociological Perspective, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 1990
Matthews, P.H, “the concise oxford dictionary of linguistic”, Oxford: oxford UP, 2002
Michael Beaney, the stanford encyclopedia of philoshopy, Summer:2012
Muhammad Farkhan, op.cit., p. 131
Moh Nazir, “Metode Penelitian”, Ghalia Indonesia: Jakarta. 1999, p. 193
Ronald wardbaugh, “an introduction to sociolinguistic”, USA:basil blackwell inc, 1988
Syal and Jindal, “an introduction to sociolinguistic: language grammar, and semantics” New Delhi:prentice-hall of india private limited, 2001
Sugiyanto, “analisis statistika sosial” bayumedia publishing: jawa timur. 2004, h.136
Suharsimi Arikunto, “prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik”, PT. Rineka cipta: jakarta.2006, h.116
Thome,B, Henley,N. languages and sex difference and dominance, 1975
Tomasz Kamusella, language versus dialect: colloquia humanistica, vol.5, 2016
Trudgill. Sociolinguistic: An Introduction to Language and Society 4th edition London: Penguin Books, 2000
Udry, J. Richard. The Nature of Gender.
Carolina : Demography, 1994 World Health Organization, what do we mean by “sex” and “gender”?, 2017http://www. who. int/gender/whatisgender/en/index. html.
Yudkin, M, Transsexualism and women: A critical prespektif,San fransisco, California: UC Hastings college of the law, 1978
Published
2022-12-28
Section
Articles